This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zvekic, U. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The International Crime (Victim) Survey: Issues of Comparative Advantages and Disadvantages

Difficulties in making international comparisons based on official national and international criminal justice statistics (United Nations Crime Surveys, INTERPOL) prompted the launching of the International Crime (Victim) Survey, which used a standard methodology and involved in two sweeps (1989 and 1992-1994) more than 30 industrialized and developing countries and countries in transition. Selected key findings are presented, and these basically highlight that, on an international comparative level, the developing world and countries in transition exhibit higher victimization rates for almost all selected types of crime, less satisfaction with law enforcement, and a more punitive orientation. The main advantages of the IC(V)S lie in the higher level of data comparability as well as in the comparative evaluation of police-community relations, attitudes toward punishment, and various crime prevention mechanisms. However, with its focus on households and individuals and selected crime types, the IC(V)S presents only a partial picture of the crime story. Other problems faced by the IC(V)S are discussed, such as what constitutes a proper sampling in countries that lack reliable population and other statistical information. Particular emphasis is placed on the tension between standardization to increase comparability on the one hand and cultural specificity on the other. Although the IC(V)S will prove to be instrumental in promoting alternative criminal justice information, particularly in the less advanced parts of the world, and in providing for more internationally comparable information, the limits of the study with respect to cultural interpretation should be clearly recognized.

International Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1-21 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/105756779600600101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. van Wilsem Criminal Victimization in Cross-National Perspective: An Analysis of Rates of Theft, Violence and Vandalism Across 27 Countries European Journal of Criminology, January 1, 2004; 1(1): 89 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Neapolitan Explaining Variation in Crime Victimization Across Nations and within Nations International Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 2003; 13(1): 76 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Neapolitan An Examination of Cross-National Variation in Punitiveness Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2001; 45(6): 691 - 710. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. Schneider Victimological Developments in the World during the Past Three Decades (I): A Study of Comparative Victimology Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2001; 45(4): 449 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]